Over 85% of companies that start using automation choose the wrong tool on their first try. The result? They waste time, lose money, and walk away thinking that “automation doesn’t work.”
This comparison between n8n, Zapier, and Make will show you exactly which one to choose based on your profile, budget, and goals.
We tested all three tools for 6 months in real-world scenarios.
Company Profile
Recommended Tool
Why
Technical Startup/SMB
n8n
Free, flexible, no limits
Traditional Company
Zapier
Easy to use, many ready-to-use integrations
Visual / Creative Company
Make
Intuitive interface, fair pricing
Criteria
n8n
Zapier
Make
Open Source
✅ Yes
❌ No
❌ No
Self-Hosting
✅ Yes
❌ No
❌ No
Native Integrations
400+
5.000+
1.500+
Conditional Logic
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐
Learning Curve
Intermediate
Very easy
Easy
Support
Community
Premium
Premium
Backup / Versioning
✅ Yes
❌ Limited
❌ Limited
Free: Self-hosted, unlimited
Cloud Starter: $20/month (5,000 executions)
Cloud Pro: $50/month (50,000 executions)
Advantage: Unlimited active workflows
Free: 100 tasks/month (5 workflows)
Starter: $19.99/month (750 tasks)
Professional: $49/month (2,000 tasks)
Disadvantage: Every action counts as a task
Free: 1,000 operations/month
Core: $9/month (10,000 operations)
Pro: $16/month (10,000 operations + features)
Advantage: Best cost-benefit for SMBs
✅ Local execution = maximum speed
✅ No throughput limits (self-hosted)
✅ Complex workflows run smoothly
❌ Requires technical knowledge to optimize
✅ Robust infrastructure
✅ 99.9% guaranteed uptime
❌ Slower in complex workflows
❌ 30-second timeout per action
✅ Visual execution simplifies debugging
✅ Good performance for mid-sized workflows
❌ Limitations with large data processing
✅ Excellent for e-commerce and marketing
Ideal for:
Teams with developers or technical staff
Need for complex automation
Low budget but aiming to scale
Sensitive data that must stay on the server
Real Use Cases:
Fintech: Payment processing with complex rules
E-commerce: ERP + marketplace + accounting integration
Agencies: Custom client reporting
SaaS: Multi-condition user onboarding
Ideal for:
Non-technical teams
Fast results
Mainstream tools
Willing to pay for convenience
Real Use Cases:
Consulting: Connect web forms to CRMs
Influencers: Automate cross-platform posts
Clinics: Sync schedule with WhatsApp
Retail Stores: Link sales with inventory
Ideal for:
Visual/creative teams
Medium complexity workflows
Balanced budget
Needs intuitive interface
Real Use Cases:
Marketing Agencies: Campaign automation
E-commerce: Abandoned cart + remarketing
Real Estate: Lead nurturing automation
Education: Online course automation
n8n
Strengths: Custom webhooks, proprietary APIs, databases
Limitations: Fewer “plug-and-play” integrations
Differential: Can create custom connectors
Zapier
Strengths: 5,000+ ready-to-use, always-updated integrations
Limitations: Limited flexibility for custom integrations
Differential: Works with any popular tool
Make
Strengths: Visual integrations, easy setup
Limitations: Fewer options than Zapier
Differential: Best UX for configuring automations
Ease Ranking (1–10):
Zapier: 9/10 – Anyone can use it
Make: 7/10 – Visual UI helps a lot
n8n: 5/10 – Requires technical skills
Time to First Automation:
Zapier: 15 minutes
Make: 30 minutes
n8n: 1–2 hours
n8n: $0 (self-hosted)
Zapier: $250/month
Make: $45/month
Winner: n8n (saves ~$3,000/year)
n8n: $250/month (cloud) or $100/month (VPS)
Zapier: $500/month
Make: $200/month
Winner: Make (best cost-benefit)
n8n: $400/month (cloud) or $200/month (VPS)
Zapier: $1,500/month
Make: $800/month
Winner: n8n (saves ~$15,600/year)
n8n
✅ Pros:
Free forever (self-hosted)
Full flexibility
No vendor lock-in
Active community
Handles complex workflows
❌ Cons:
Learning curve
Requires maintenance
Fewer native integrations
Limited support
Zapier
✅ Pros:
Very easy to use
5,000+ integrations
Excellent support
High reliability
Maintenance-free
❌ Cons:
Expensive at high volumes
Limited flexibility
Vendor lock-in
Technical limitations
Make
✅ Pros:
Intuitive visual interface
Fair pricing
Great for mid-level workflows
Adequate support
Decent flexibility
❌ Cons:
Fewer integrations than Zapier
Struggles with complex use cases
Still dependent on provider
🏆 For Startups & Tech Teams: n8n
If you have someone technical on your team and want maximum control and cost savings, n8n is unbeatable. Annual savings can reach $18,000 compared to Zapier.
🏆 For Traditional Companies: Zapier
If you need something that just works right away with no hassle and can pay for convenience, Zapier is the safest choice.
🏆 For Balanced SMBs: Make
If you want a middle ground between ease of use and flexibility, with fair pricing, Make offers the best value for money.
Choose n8n if you:
Have a developer/technical team
Want maximum cost savings
Need complex workflows
Handle sensitive data/compliance
Want full control
Choose Zapier if you:
Have a non-technical team
Need immediate results
Use mainstream tools
Have a flexible budget
Prioritize convenience
Choose Make if you:
Have a visual/creative team
Want a balanced budget
Run medium complexity workflows
Need a friendly interface
Want decent flexibility
Try the free version of all three platforms using the same workflow
Calculate ROI based on your execution volume
Evaluate your team’s technical capacity
Start simple and scale as needed
Remember: The best tool is the one your team can use consistently and that fits your budget.
Liked it? Share it.
Latest News